MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116988651 · doi:10.1002/alz70861_108716

Valiltramiprosate Effects on Microstructural Integrity of Grey and White Matter in APOE4/4 Homozygotes with Early AD and their Correlations to Clinical Outcomes: MRI Mean Diffusivity Results from the 78‐Week APOLLOE4 Phase 3 Trial

2025· article· en· W7116988651 on OpenAlexaff
Earvin Liang, Susan Abushakra, P. Murali Doraiswamy, Duygu Tosun, Marwan N. Sabbagh, Anton P. Porsteinsson, David Watson, Aidan Power, Sharon Cohen, Emer MacSweeney, Chris J. Conklin, Madhura Ingalhalikar, John A. Hey, Patrick Kesslak, Susan Flint, Arthur Rosenthal, Adem Albayrak, Martin Tolar

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite matterThermal diffusivityHippocampal formationGrey matterPhase (matter)Diffusion MRINeurodegenerationNeuroimaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Valiltramiprosate/ALZ-801, an oral inhibitor of amyloid oligomer formation, was evaluated in a Phase 3 trial in APOE4/4 subjects with Early AD. While the study did not meet its primary clinical endpoint, volumetric MRI (vMRI) showed significant brain atrophy slowing. The pre-specified MCI subgroup showed positive effects on both clinical and vMRI outcomes. Amyloid oligomers are hypothesized to cause synaptic dysfunction and axonal damage, leading to microstructural changes and volume loss. The effects of valiltramiprosate on microstructural tissue changes in grey/white matter (GM, WM) were investigated using mean water diffusivity (MD) on diffusion MRI (dMRI-MD). METHOD: This study enrolled 325 APOE4/4 homozygotes (162 placebo, 163 valiltramirposate) stratified by MCI/Mild AD. The ADAS-Cog13/CDR-SB were primary/key secondary outcomes; hippocampal volume and cortical thickness (HV, CT) were main/secondary vMRI outcomes, respectively. dMRI from 1.5/3 Tesla scanners were centrally analyzed by Clario Inc. (lower MD indicates tissue preservation). MMRM was primary analysis; Pearson's correlations were conducted. RESULT: The clinical/vMRI datasets included 320/290 subjects respectively; dMRI included 206 subjects (84 MCI, 122 Mild AD). In the overall population, valiltramiprosate effects on MD compared to placebo showed positive trends (p <0.1) on cingulate/occipital cortex and caudate/striatum, and significant WM effects (corpus callosum genu [GCC] p <0.001; fornix p =0.007). Mild AD showed positive trends on occipital cortex and significant WM effects (GCC p =0.005; fornix p =0.019). MCI showed significant effects in cingulate (p =0.031) and WM (GCC/whole CC: p =0.003/0.013) and fornix (p =0.032). In MCI active arm, dMRI effects correlated significantly with clinical and volumetric effects. Frontal cortex MD correlated significantly with ADAS-Cog13/CDR-SB (p < 0.05) and HV and CT (both p =0.002). WM-GCC diffusivity correlations to HV (p =0.03) and CT were significant (p =0.006). CONCLUSION: Consistent with valiltramiprosate's effects on brain volumes, its effects on microstructural integrity were most prominent in the MCI subgroup that showed lower diffusivity in the cingulate cortex and major hippocampal outflow tracts. This microstructural preservation correlated significantly with preservation of HV/CT and with clinical benefits. These findings support valiltramiprosate's proposed mechanism: inhibiting oligomer formation may directly protect synapses/axons from damage, thus slowing neurodegeneration at a microstructural level and contributing to macrostructural preservation of brain volumes and clinical benefit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→