MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7116990937 · doi:10.1002/alz70860_103198

A web‐based multidomain intervention improves modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease

2025· article· en· W7116990937 on OpenAlexaffabout
Haakon B. Nygaard, Sylvie Belleville, Nicole Anderson, Paul Brewster, Andrew Lim, Manuel Montero‐Odasso, January Durant, Jody‐Lynn Lupo, Penelope Slack, John R. Best, Howard Chertkow, Howard Feldman, CCNA‐CAN‐THUMBS UP Study Group

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaBaycrest HospitalOntario Brain InstituteUniversity of TorontoToronto Dementia Research AllianceCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversity of VictoriaInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseIntervention (counseling)PopulationRisk factorRisk assessmentMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The Canadian Therapeutics Platform for Multidomain Interventions to Prevent Dementia (CAN-THUMBS UP (CTU)) was developed to address modifiable lifestyle risk factors through its online program Brain Health PRO (BHPro), to enable Canadians to participate remotely across a broad geography, and at a significantly lower operational cost compared to in-person initiatives. This program self surveys multiple risk factors and provides personalized profiles to its participants. We report here on the results of the inception cohort's risk factor profiles and longitudinal outcomes following the BHPro intervention. METHOD: A twelve-month, prospective, multi-center, longitudinal study of BHPro was launched in March 2022. 353 participants throughout Canada were enrolled, including older adults with no cognitive impairment or those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and at least one dementia risk factor (first-degree family history of dementia, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, body mass index >30 or physical inactivity). The intervention comprised of 181 online, interactive chapters covering dementia risk factors, delivered progressively over 10 months. The primary outcome was dementia literacy, and secondary outcomes included self-efficacy, both of which are reported separately. The exploratory outcomes included a change in a composite score of 7 self-reported, modifiable risk factors, including physical activity, nutrition, cognitive engagement, social/psychological function, vascular health, sleep, and vision/hearing, as well as change in individual risk factors. Lifestyle questionnaires were adapted from published literature. RESULT: A covariate-adjusted mixed linear model for the intention-to-treat sample (N = 353; mean age = 69.7) revealed a significant positive change in a composite lifestyle risk score at 6 months (standardized change = 0.162; p < 0.001), and 12 months (standardized change = 0.167; p < 0.001). Individually, physical activity, nutrition, cognitive engagement, and sleep showed statistically significant improvements at both 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: BHPro, a relatively inexpensive web-based multidomain intervention, improves key modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease following a program duration of either 6 or 12 months. Future studies will assess efficacy in a larger and more diverse population at risk for Alzheimers disease, and prospectively determine how improving lifestyle may reduce the risk of developing dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→