Integrating Remote Sensing Indices and Ensemble Machine Learning Model with Independent HEC-RAS 2D Model for Enhanced Flood Prediction and Risk Assessment in the Ottawa River Watershed
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Floods rank among the most destructive natural hazards worldwide. In Canada’s capital region—Ottawa and its surrounding areas—flood prediction is crucial, especially in flood-prone zones, to improve flood mitigation strategies, given its historical record-breaking events in 2017 and 2019, which resulted in substantial damage to homes and infrastructure in the region. Previous studies in these regions typically did not use remote sensing techniques or advanced methods to enhance flood susceptibility prediction and extent mapping. This study addressed the gap by incorporating 18 flood conditioning factors and integrating high-performance machine learning algorithms such as Random Forest, Support Vector Machines and XGBoost to develop ensemble flood susceptibility models. The HEC-RAS 2D model was used to simulate hydrodynamic variables based on a 100-year flood scenario. The developed ensemble model for flood susceptibility prediction achieved strong performance (Kappa, F1-score, and AUC all above 0.979) and demonstrated model transferability, maintaining high accuracy (Kappa > 0.850, F1-score > 0.920, AUC > 0.990) when applied to other sub-regions. The hydraulic model reveals that flood velocity and depth differ across sub-regions, reaching maximums of 15 m/s and 15 m, respectively. SHAP analysis indicates Elevation, Handmodel, MNDWI, NDWI, and Aspect are key factors influencing floods. These findings and methods help Natural Resources Canada develop tools and policies for effective flood risk reduction in the Ottawa River watershed and similar regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".