MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117105476 · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2025.3647877

Tailored to Fit Sepsis Individuals: Medical Knowledge Aware Reinforcement Learning Model Offers Optimized Therapeutic Strategies

2025· article· en· W7117105476 on OpenAlexaff
Xue Feng, Siyi Zhu, Luping Fang, Huaiping Zhu, Guolong Cai, Yanfei Shen, Gangmin Ning

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningTransfer of learningOntologySepsisDeep learningDiseaseGeneralization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome, with high morbidity and mortality. Timely treatments and precise interventions are crucial for improving sepsis patient outcomes. Reinforcement learning (RL) models have made promising advances in associating sepsis treatments. However, existing models face obstacles when applied to heterogeneous sepsis patients with an imbalanced distribution of disease severity, struggling to maintain optimal performance. To provide optimal therapeutic intervention strategies for sepsis with different disease severity, we proposed a novel treatment recommendation model named Medical ontology knowledge and disease diagnosis Position aware Transfer learning - Double Dueling Deep Q Network (MPT-D3QN). Through the attention mechanism, medical ontology knowledge and disease diagnosis positions were introduced to achieve a more accurate representation of patient states. Subsequently, an offline deep reinforcement learning algorithm was used to recommend therapeutic intervention strategies for a specific patient population. The transfer learning framework was responsible for the information transfer across patient groups in different domains. We trained and tested MPT-D3QN model on the Multi-Parameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) dataset. Compared with the reported strategies in present clinical practice, the MPT-D3QN model could obtain a higher expected return value (12.98 vs. 10.61) and reduce the estimated mortality from 13.20% to 6.15% in all test datasets. Moreover, the experimental test on an external dataset eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU) further demonstrated the robust generalization capability of the model. Compared with the state-of-the-art models, the proposed model not only guaranteed higher expected returns but also generated optimal and interpretable treatment strategies for sepsis with different disease severity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health InformaticsSame topicSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207