MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Probing the Chemical Space of Polymerase Theta with Nucleotide Analogues Bearing a Stereogenic All-Carbon Quaternary Center

2025· article· en· W7117105568 on OpenAlexafffund
Amarender Manchoju, Nicole M. Duffy, Renaud Zelli, Carla Eymard, Michel Gallant, Alix Genieyz, Marc-Olivier Labbé, Tommy Lussier, Guillaume Michaud, Léa Théroux, Starr Dostie, W. Cameron Black, Yvan Guindon, Michel Prévost

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersCanadian Glycomics NetworkNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsStereocenterNucleotidePolymeraseDNAPoly ADP ribose polymeraseGenome instabilityDNA polymeraseEnzymeChemical spaceMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report findings on a novel family of nucleotide analogues with selective inhibitory activity against DNA polymerase theta (Polθ), a key enzyme in the theta-mediated end joining pathway and a critical player in synthetic lethality-based cancer therapies. Polθ's intrinsically low fidelity, which contributes to genomic instability in homologous recombination-deficient tumors, was probed for selective targeting by these analogues. The newly identified compounds feature an all-carbon stereogenic quaternary center at either the C3' or C2' position of the furanoside ring, a structural modification that has already demonstrated potential in antiviral, anticancer, and cardioprotective applications. Biochemical assays suggest these analogues exploit Polθ's unique active site architecture, offering a possible direction for overcoming PARP inhibitor resistance and enhancing personalized cancer treatment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Medicinal Chemistry LettersSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207