Cultural ecosystem services and sense of place: post-rehabilitation assessment of Wadi Hanifah’s performance from a socio-cultural lens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper evaluates the socio-cultural performance of urban ecological rehabilitation through the lens of cultural ecosystem services (CES) and sense of place. Accordingly, it introduces a dynamic, context-sensitive evaluative framework that integrates place image, identity, and attachment as key performance indicators. The framework is applied to the rehabilitation of Wadi Hanifah in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, using a mixed-methods approach that combines document reviews, online surveys, and semi-structured interviews to assess shifts in the Wadi’s meaning and use post-rehabilitation. Findings reveal a transformation in the Wadi’s place image – from associations with degradation and utilitarian function to one centered on recreation and heritage. The results underscore how ecological rehabilitation can foster socio-cultural value and strengthen collective identity. The proposed framework not only supports future evaluations of Wadi Hanifah but also offers a transferable model for assessing similar projects elsewhere, advancing more holistic understandings of the interplay between ecosystems and human experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".