MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117116681 · doi:10.1177/27536386251405917

The physical preparation of paramedicine students for the paramedic role: A scoping review

2025· article· en· W7117116681 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueParamedicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocumentationIrishCurriculumGrey literatureProgram evaluationMEDLINEPhysical fitnessHigher education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paramedic role is physically demanding, yet limited attention has been given to how paramedicine students are physically prepared for practice within tertiary education programmes. The extent to which physical fitness standards and training are embedded in curricula, professional registration requirements or pre-employment testing remains unclear. This review explored how paramedicine students are physically prepared within tertiary education and whether student fitness levels meet the demands of the paramedic role in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom (UK), Ireland and Canada. A scoping review was conducted and reported following guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, ERIC, Emcare and Informit) and grey literature sources (university handbooks, policy documents and online domains) were searched, with searches completed in June 2025. Curriculum documentation from 51 universities, two organisation or college documents and nine relevant studies were analysed. Four universities (one in Australia and three in South Africa) in the six countries (Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada and South Africa) included in the review clearly embedded physical fitness training in their curricula. Most Australian institutions addressed fitness only as a requirement of work-integrated learning (WIL), typically mandated by placement providers. Internationally, South African programmes integrated sequenced physical preparation within curricula, while UK and Irish programmes applied entry screening prior to enrolment with manual handling training integrated within curricula. One study found that student fitness levels were comparable to the general population, but there is inconsistent data whether they meet all of the essential job demands of the paramedic role. There is limited and inconsistent integration of physical fitness information and preparation in paramedicine education. Embedding structured physical readiness frameworks into curricula may improve student support and preparedness for WIL. Future research should investigate validated physical fitness standards and strategies to ensure student readiness for the physical demands of the paramedic role.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.468 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it