MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117117121 · doi:10.3138/tjt-2025-0052

Uncertainty, Flourishing, and Existential Psychotherapy: Referencing Muhammad Iqbal's Model of Self

2025· article· en· W7117117121 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Abrahim H. Khan, Nadezhda Gonotskaya

Bibliographic record

VenueToronto Journal of Theology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExistentialismSketchSelfObstacleIslamProcess (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses an alternative way of thinking about self as a psychosocial dynamic process advanced by Muhammad Iqbal (1876–1935), a cosmopolitan philosopher-psychologist of Indo-Islamic heritage. His model of self is advanced here as a resource for an existential psychotherapy approach more hospitable for working with mental health clients of an Islamic cultural background than approaches informed by the existential thinking strand in a European philosophical tradition. Iqbal's model of the self is open to an understanding of truth and uncertainty as factors in how we live and think, and how we find or situate ourselves in the world. The sketch here of his model of self shows recognition that uncertainty is a necessary ingredient for health and wellbeing, and not merely an obstacle in self-identity forming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.031
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueToronto Journal of TheologySame topicReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207