MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117117465 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_099643

Research on the Correlation between Serum Vitamin D Level and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease in Plateau Areas

2025· article· en· W7117117465 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aiqin Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorrelationVitamin D and neurologyDiseaseCognitionCognitive impairmentHypoxia (environmental)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: To explore the impact of serum vitamin D level on the cognitive function of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients in hypoxia environment. METHOD: From September 2021 to September 2024, 231 PD patients (aged 66.88±11.10 years) were selected from the Parkinson's clinic of Qinghai Provincial People's Hospital(Average altitude:2300 meters). According to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), they were divided into 66 the normal cognitive group (NC),114 mild cognitive impairment group (MCI), and 51 Parkinson's dementia group (PDD), Demographic data were collected, PD and cognition-related scales were evaluated, and blood index were measured. RESULT: There were statistically significant differences in age, gender, education, family situation, occupation, smoking and hyperhidrosis among the three groups (p <0.05). Compared with the NC group, there were increased the total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score, UPDRS-I, II, III, Hoehn-Yahr (H-Y) stage, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Activity of Daily Living (ADL) in MCI group and PDD group, while MMSE, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA), red blood cells, hemoglobin, folic acid, and vitamin B12 decreased (p <0.05). Parkinson's cognitive decline(PDCI) was positively correlated with age (r=0.033), hyperhidrosis (r=0.054), total UPDRS score (r=0.002) and H-Y stage (r=0.502), while, negatively correlated with folic acid (r=-0.189), vitamin D (r=-0.039), red blood cells (r=-0.188), and hemoglobin (r=-0.004). Ordered regression display that UPDRS-II (activities of daily living) (OR=1.100, 95%CI=1.021-1.206) was a risk factor for PDCI, Vitamin D (OR=0.169, 95%CI=-0.349-0.271) was a protective factor (p <0.05). CONCLUSION: High serum vitamin D levels have a protective effect on PDCI, while a decline in ADL can lead to cognitive impairment in hypoxia environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicVitamin D Research Studies→French-language works237,207→