MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117121025 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-32031-9

Focused ultrasound-mediated drug delivery of bevacizumab in treating NF2-related schwannomatosis in an animal model

2025· article· en· W7117121025 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer L. Spiegel, Alessandro De Maio, Manita V. Patel, Omer J. Ungar, Carolyn Lai, Tra Truong, Yumai Situ, D. Wade Clapp, Simon J. Conway, Joseph M. Chen, Vincent Y. W. Lin, Kullervo Hynynen, Meaghan A. O’Reilly, T. Le

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBevacizumabNeurofibromatosisNeurofibromatosis type 2Drug deliveryAnimal modelDrugChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2)-related schwannomatosis is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder characterized by the development of cranial and peripheral nerve schwannomas, including bilateral vestibular schwannomas which are associated with substantial morbidity. Current therapeutic strategies comprise surgical resection, radiotherapy, and systemic administration of bevacizumab; however, these approaches are frequently limited by high recurrence rates and morbidity. In this study, a transgenic murine model (Postn-Cre;Nf2flox/flox) was employed to investigate the combined effect of intraperitoneally administered human bevacizumab (5 mg/kg b. w.) and focused ultrasound (FUS) on drug delivery and tumor growth in DRG schwannomas. ELISA-based analysis demonstrated a 3.8-fold increase in intratumoral bevacizumab concentration following the combined application of human bevacizumab and FUS, compared to bevacizumab alone. Tumor growth was assessed using 7-T MRI of the spine with intravenous gadolinium contrast, and outcomes were compared across five experimental groups: (1) human bevacizumab alone, (2) murine bevacizumab alone, (3) human bevacizumab combined with FUS, (4) FUS alone, and (5) untreated controls. Treatments, including drug administration and FUS exposure, were performed three times at two-week intervals. Notably, the combined treatment group (human bevacizumab + FUS) exhibited a trend toward tumor size reduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Reports→Same topicNeurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases→French-language works237,207→