MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117121652 · doi:10.2196/80529

Effectiveness of Postdischarge Telephone Calls in Reducing Hospital Utilization: Quasi-Randomized Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W7117121652 on OpenAlexaff
Sandie Du, A Anada, Maruie Maitland, Sean Chuan, Sonia Jose, Harveer Sihota, D.G. Cooper, Joanna Marie B. Rivera, Dianne Burditt, Minetaro Naruki-van Velzen, Megan MacPherson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Internet Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Failure Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaFraser Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialTelemedicineMEDLINETelehealthHealth careTelephone call

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Unplanned emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions following discharge contribute to patient distress, increased health care costs, and system inefficiencies. Early postdischarge follow-up can improve care transitions, yet evidence on the effectiveness of telephone-based interventions remains mixed. Telephone calls, a low-barrier form of digital health, may enhance equity and accessibility by reaching patients who face challenges with in-person or higher-technology follow-up. Objective: This study evaluated the impact of a nurse-led postdischarge telephone intervention delivered by Fraser Health Virtual Care on short-term ED visits and hospital readmissions among recently discharged high-risk patients. Secondary objectives included examining patient experiences with the service and identifying care gaps addressed during follow-up calls. Methods: A pragmatic quasi-randomized trial was conducted (May 2022-September 2022). Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older and classified as high-risk for readmission using the LACE (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Comorbidities, and Emergency department use) index (≥10 or <9 and ≥45 y). Participants were allocated to either a postdischarge telephone intervention group or a standard care control group based on daily nurse availability. Intervention participants received a structured nurse-led call 48 hours after discharge assessing understanding of discharge instructions, medication management, follow-up appointments, and home supports. Primary outcomes were ED visits within 7 and 30 days post call; secondary outcomes were hospital readmissions and patient experience. Negative binomial regression models were used to calculate adjusted incident rate ratios (IRRs). Results: A total of 7091 participants were included (intervention: n=3911, of whom 1752 completed the call; control: n=3180). Postdischarge calls significantly reduced ED visits at both 7 days (adjusted IRR 0.719, 95% CI 0.617-0.837; P<.001) and 30 days (IRR 0.878, 95% CI 0.783-0.983; P=.02). No statistically significant reductions were observed in hospital readmissions at either 7 days (IRR 0.809; P=.13) or 30 days (IRR 0.942; P=.54). Forty percent of completed calls (n=701) identified at least 1 gap in discharge understanding or follow-up care. Most participants found the calls helpful and reported increased confidence in managing their care. Conclusions: Structured nurse-led postdischarge telephone calls significantly reduced short-term ED utilization but did not impact readmission rates. These findings support the role of telephone-based virtual care as a scalable, low-barrier strategy to improve care transitions and reduce avoidable ED visits. Additional or ongoing interventions may be required to influence hospital readmission outcomes among high-risk patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Internet ResearchSame topicHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207