Clinical implications of frailty in hospitalized patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives Frailty is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in chronic lung disease, but its prognosis has not been evaluated in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study aimed to assess: (1) impact of frailty on hospital length of stay (LOS) and health-care utilization in PAH; (2) association of frailty with 1-year post-discharge outcomes. Methods Retrospective, single-centered cohort study of consecutive PAH patients admitted non-electively (January 2009-December 2018), predominantly for right heart failure (57%). Frailty was defined as ≥ 0.25 using a cumulative deficits frailty index. Disease characteristics, hospital factors, and mortality were compared using univariate analysis and multivariable regression, adjusting for age and sex. Results 44/96 (46%) PAH patients were frail. Frailty was associated with older age, greater comorbidities, and lower six-minute walk distance pre-admission ( p < 0.05). Frail patients had a longer hospital LOS (4 days 95% (0.4–6.3), p = 0.04) and were more likely to receive social work consultation (36% vs 13%, p = 0.01), independent of age and sex. There were no adjusted differences (frail vs non-frail) in hospital mortality (OR:1.01 95% (0.28–3.72) or 12-months mortality post-discharge (HR:1.26 95% (0.48–3.29). Conclusion Frailty was associated with greater hospital LOS and interdisciplinary support, but not 1-year mortality. Future studies should explore whether alternative frailty models may be more informative of longer-term PAH outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".