The City of Labrys (Semibratnee) on the Border of the Bosporan Kingdom: First Results of the Expedition of the State Historical Museum / Bosporos Krallığı Sınırındaki Labrys Kenti (Semibratnee Yerleşimi): Devlet Tarih Müzesi Ekibinin Araştırmalarından İlk Sonuçlar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the first results of the State Historical Museum expedition (2024–2025) at the Semibratnee fortified settlement, identified with ancient Labrys, located on the southeastern frontier of the Bosporan Kingdom. Building on earlier geomagnetic prospection (2018–2019) and previous research, we evaluate a rectilinear, cardinally oriented complex near the fortification line, preliminarily interpreted as an agora bordered by stoai. Excavations in Trench II (c. 500 m²) exposed the western end of the Southern Stoa (Rooms 1–2), an adjacent street with a stone-built drainage channel, and associated architectural elements, including reused Doric components. Stratigraphic observations and ceramic evidence date the primary use of the excavated street and stoa sector to the 4th century BC and the first half of the 3rd century BC, with at least two construction phases, the earlier one likely ending in a fire episode. A roof-tile collapse in Room 2 suggests destruction no later than the mid/ third quarter of the 3rd century BC, followed by the apparent abandonment of this area. A later intramural burial (1st century BC–1st century AD) indicates the long-term disuse of the public complex and its drainage system. These results provide the first excavated evidence for planned civic architecture at Labrys and outline a preliminary chronological framework to be tested by future large-scale investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".