A New Three-Port DC–DC–AC Converter With Single-Phase Buck–Boost AC Output
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an innovative topology of a three-port DC-DC-AC converter, along with its modulation strategy, aimed at seamlessly integrating DC energy sources and storage systems within (hybrid) DC and AC microgrids or feeding DC and AC loads. The converter combines the functions of two separate circuits (DC-DC and DC-AC) into a unified topology, reducing component count, implementation costs, conversion stages, and related power losses. Compared to counterparts, this new circuit requires only five switches, fully shared between the DC and AC ports; offers a broad range of buck-boost voltage operations, making it ideal for connecting with series-connected DC sources, such as a string photovoltaic system, where the input voltage may vary both above and below the DC and AC output levels; all three ports of the proposed converter support bidirectional current flow, enabling battery bank charging, while this bidirectional flow in the DC and AC ports allows for power sharing between the two microgrids, acting as an interlink converter; and incorporates 2<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">nd</sup> order LC filters at each port, ensuring a continuous and low-ripple current flow for both the DC and AC ports. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of the topology, modulation method, operational performance, and comparative assessments, all of which are validated by experimental tests, achieving a peak efficiency of 96.6%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".