MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117126784 · doi:10.1109/tac.2025.3647572

Super-Twisting Sliding Mode Control for Markovian Jump Systems Based on Quantized Output-Feedback

2025· article· W7117126784 on OpenAlexaff
Zixin Huang, Sai Zhou, Jun Song, Zhan Shu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ReachabilitySliding mode controlMarkov processQuantization (signal processing)JumpMode (computer interface)Output feedback

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focused on designing the super-twisting algorithm (STA)-based output- feedback sliding mode control (SMC) for multi-input Markovian jump systems under digital channel transmission. Specifically, the uniform quantization strategy is employed to implement the network communication for both the measured outputs and the sliding variables. It is shown that the novel quantized-data-based output- feedback STA can guarantee the practical reachability of the sliding variable with probability one by means of a dynamic adjustment policy for quantizers' parameters. Sufficient conditions for the existence of the feasible STA parameters and output- feedback SMC gains are proposed in terms ofnonconvexequalities and inequalities, which can be solved effectively via a modified genetic algorithm combining the gridding search technique. Finally, a numerical example is provided to verify the effectiveness of the proposed STA-based SMC scheme for Markovian jump system via quantized output- feedback.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207