Lipid nanoparticle protein coronas arise through lipoprotein fusion rather than shell-like adsorption
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The protein corona influences the in vivo biodistribution of ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in nucleic acid delivery, yet its structural architecture remains poorly defined. Using cryo-transmission electron microscopy, we visualized LNP-protein interactions in their native state. We show that, unlike the discrete “fuzzy” shells observed on hard nanoparticles, LNPs displayed no peripheral protein shell. Instead, controlled incubation and competitive “dual-particle” assays, supported by molecular dynamics simulations, indicate that LNP membranes undergo localized thickening and electron-dense remodeling consistent with lipoprotein integration rather than surface adsorption. Similar features were observed in extracellular vesicles, suggesting this behavior is shared among lipid-based carriers, and proteomic analysis identified apolipoproteins as the dominant associated proteins. Together, these findings support a model in which the biological identity of LNPs arises through membrane remodeling rather than shell-like adsorption, and provide a framework for the rational design of targeted nanomedicines. TOC Graphic
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".