MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117129885 · doi:10.1061/jtepbs.teeng-9335

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Trajectory Control of Connected and Automated Vehicles at a Mixed-Traffic Intersection

2025· article· en· W7117129885 on OpenAlex
Fan Wu, Huiyu Chen, Tony Qiu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Transportation Engineering Part A Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersection (aeronautics)Reinforcement learningTrajectoryAccelerationFocus (optics)Control (management)Intelligent transportation systemOptimal controlFunction (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vehicle trajectory control has garnered significant interest due to the potential of connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) to enhance traffic efficiency and reduce accidents. Effective vehicle control is crucial for autonomous driving and has traditionally been addressed through motion control methods. In recent years, a growing focus has been on deep learning (DL), particularly deep reinforcement learning (DRL), to optimize CAV control. These advanced techniques enable CAVs to learn and adapt to their environment, further advancing autonomous driving capabilities. However, much research primarily focuses on simple and ideal scenarios involving fully CAV environments. Although there is research on mixed-traffic scenarios with both CAVs and human-driven vehicles (HDVs), it often neglects other road participants such as pedestrians and cyclists. Many studies on trajectory control focus on enhancing traffic efficiency and reducing vehicle emissions. However, it is equally essential to consider safety improvements in mixed-traffic environments. Addressing the aforementioned issues, this paper proposes a DRL-based trajectory control approach for CAVs at a mixed-traffic intersection involving CAVs, HDVs, and pedestrians. CAVs learn policies for various actions to reach their destinations. The acceleration of the CAVs is optimized using the deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) algorithm to maximize a reward function that accounts for safety, energy efficiency, and traffic efficiency. Our approach is tested using the Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) platform to model realistic intersection dynamics. Results demonstrated that the proposed method significantly improved traffic efficiency and reduced fuel consumption, while notably decreasing both vehicle–vehicle and vehicle–pedestrian conflicts. This research highlights the importance of incorporating diverse road users into CAV control strategies and contributes to the development of safer, greener, and more inclusive traffic management solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.520

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it