MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117129909 · doi:10.1186/s40644-025-00976-9

A “calcification”-enhanced deep learning approach for precise differentiation of thyroid nodules

2025· article· en· W7117129909 on OpenAlexaff
Xiao-Xiao Zhu, Chen Chen, Yahan Zhou, Lingyan Zhou, Qingquan He, Xiao Zhang, Jincao Yao, Chenke Xu, Dong Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsThyroid nodulesCalcificationNodule (geology)Receiver operating characteristicUltrasoundThyroid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Calcification is one of the most valuable imaging features in the ultrasound diagnosis of thyroid nodules. A calcification-enhanced deep learning (DL) approach was developed in this study for the automatic detection of thyroid nodules and their intranodular calcifications from ultrasound images. Calcification features were integrated into the modeling process to improve the accuracy of benign-malignant differentiation for thyroid nodules. METHODS: A total of 6886 thyroid nodules from 3 hospitals, collected between January 2014 and March 2024, were retrospectively included in this study. These nodules were partitioned into training, validation, and test sets at a ratio of 7:1:2. All nodules had a clearly documented final clinical diagnosis of benign or malignant status. A DL model that integrates intranodular calcification features and nodule imaging features was constructed. The model was trained using the training set, hyperparameters were optimized using the validation set, and final evaluation was conducted on an independent test set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the primary evaluation metric. RESULTS: Among the 6886 thyroid nodules included in this study, 4433 were benign and 2453 were malignant. DLAM−CFF—a DL model that integrates intranodular calcification features and nodule imaging features—exhibited excellent performance in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules within the independent test cohort. Its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.863, 0.864, and 0.864, respectively, with an AUC of 0.925. DLAM−CFF was compared with DLCFF (a DL model relying solely on nodule features) and traditional DL models, including Xception, InceptionResNetV2, DenseNet121, and ResNet50. The results indicated that the AUC values of these comparative models were 0.832, 0.805, 0.821, 0.813, and 0.798, respectively—all of which were significantly lower than those of DLAM−CFF (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The “calcification”-enhanced DL model proposed in this study not only enables the automatic detection of thyroid nodules and their intranodular calcifications in ultrasound images but also demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance in predicting the benignity or malignancy of thyroid nodules by integrating the overall features of nodules with calcification features.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ImagingSame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207