MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117130842 · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2025.101752

High canola meal in sow diets: effects on reproduction, piglet growth, milk composition, serum metabolites, and nutrient digestibility over two reproductive cycles

2025· article· en· W7117130842 on OpenAlexafffund
X. Zhang, A. Rogiewicz, E.G. Kiarie, C. Yang, C.M. Nyachoti

Bibliographic record

Venueanimal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanola Council of Canada
KeywordsCanolaLitterMealSoybean mealFecesLactationRandomized block designGestation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Feed costs and global demand for soybean meal are increasing, reducing profitability in pig industry. Canola meal is the second most used protein source in swine diets, but evidence on its long-term effects across successive sow parities is limited. This study investigated the effects of canola meal inclusion as the main protein source in sow diets on sow and litter performance over two reproductive cycles. Sixty-eight sows from two batches were randomly allotted one of two diets on d 80 of pregnancy. The control diet (CON) consisted of corn, barley and soybean meal, and the treatment diet (CSCM) consisted of corn, barley and canola meal, included at 14.50% for gestating and 24.50% for lactating sows. The BW and backfat thickness of sows were measured on d 1, d 35, d 80, and d 111 of pregnancy, and on d 1 and d 21 post-farrowing. On d 1 and d 19 post-farrowing, piglets were weighed and milk and blood samples from sows were collected to determine milk composition and serum metabolites. Fecal samples from sows were collected on d 110 of gestation and d 19 of lactation to determine apparent total digestibility (ATTD) determination. Data were analyzed using a randomized complete block design with repeated measures. Results showed that sow BW and backfat thickness were unaffected by diet. Sows fed the CSCM diet exhibited lower (P < 0.05) BW gain than CON sows during late gestation in the first cycle but not in the second cycle. Litter performance, including weight and size, was unaffected by dietary treatment, though litter weight at birth was higher (P < 0.05) in the second cycle than in the first cycle. The composition of colostrum and milk was generally unaffected by diet or cycle, except for colostrum fat, which showed a significant interaction (P < 0.05) between diet and cycle. Serum metabolites revealed tendencies (P < 0.10) for increased creatinine and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) with the CSCM diet, while reproductive cycle effects were observed for GGT, cholesterol, calcium, protein, and albumin levels. Apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients was not significantly influenced by diet or reproductive cycle, though the CSCM diet tended to reduce (P = 0.06) the ATTD of CP. In conclusion, sow diets containing 14.50% canola meal during gestation and 24.50% during lactation maintained similar sow reproductive and litter performance comparable with soybean meal-based diets across two reproductive cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueanimalSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207