MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117140280 · doi:10.1002/alz70855_104930

Spatial transcriptomics of cerebral amyloid angiopathy and amyloid‐β related angiitis

2025· article· en· W7117140280 on OpenAlexaff
Marcel S. Woo, Alexandros Hadjilaou, Lukas Raich, Matthias Dottermusch, Björn Rissiek, Manuel A. Friese, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Tim Magnus, Markus Glatzel

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral amyloid angiopathyTranscriptomePerivascular spaceVasculitisAmyloid (mycology)DiseaseBlood vesselInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The removal of amyloid-β (Aβ) by antibodies has revolutionized the treatment landscape of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Vascular Aβ has been implicated in the emergence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA). A better understanding of the effect of Aβ on blood vessels is required to find new biomarkers and treatments for ARIA. METHOD: We generated tissue microarrays of brain biopsies of 4 controls, 3 primary CNS vasculitis (PCNVS), 4 cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), and 5 amyloid-β-related angiitis (ABRA) patients and performed histopathology and Visium 10x spatial RNA-sequencing. We performed clustering, compared the spots that contained blood vessels between the 4 conditions and used gene ontology analyses to define disease-specific signatures. Last, we tested whether the inflammatory blood vessel signatures could be identified in CSF SOMAscan proteomics of 173 A-T-N-, 82 A+T-N-, 164 A+T+N-, and 144 A+T+N+ individuals of the AD neuroimaging initiative (ADNI). Correlation analyses in A+ and A- individuals of the inflammatory signature with more than 7000 proteins were performed. RESULTS: Tissue microarrays allowed a scalable approach for spatial transcriptomics and histology. CAA and ABRA patients showed a strong vascular Aβ accumulation but only ABRA patients had additional T cell infiltrates and stronger blood brain barrier leakage. Spatial transcriptomics allowed the deconvolution of spots that contained different parenchymal cell types like neurons, astrocytes or endothelial cells. Comparing the blood vessels between the conditions revealed a CAA-specific signature that was characterized by cellular detoxification. PCNVS and ABRA showed an overlapping inflammatory signature, however, the blood vessels from ABRA patients showed a type I interferon response that was absent in CAA and PCNVS. Using OAS1 as a biomarker for the type I interferon response, we identified strong correlations between OAS1 and endothelial cell biomarkers in the CSF of ADNI participants. In contrast, OAS1 was stronger associated with the activation of the interferon response and cell death pathways in A+ than in A- participants. CONCLUSION: We identified Aβ-specific inflammatory blood vessel signatures in brain biopsies and the CSF of an AD continuum cohort. This study will help to prioritize biomarkers and treatments for Aβ-induced vascular pathologies and potentially ARIA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207