New insights and predictability from in vivo recordings of paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity in disorders of consciousness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (PSH) is a severe complication of acquired brain injuries (ABIs), characterized by sudden autonomic surges that exacerbate clinical outcomes. Its pathophysiology remains debated, and early biomarkers are lacking. This study aims to investigate autonomic changes preceding PSH and assess the feasibility of predictive modeling using heart rate variability (HRV). METHODS: Continuous electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings were obtained from six male patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC), including unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state. A total of 24 PSH episodes and 24 matched control (noPSH) events were analyzed. HRV metrics, including entropy measures and power spectral density (PSD), were evaluated. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was implemented to differentiate PSH from control events and to predict PSH onset. RESULTS: PSH events were associated with significant heart rate increases, reduced entropy-based complexity, and decreased PSD in both low-frequency (LF) and high-frequency (HF) bands. An increased very-low-frequency (VLF)/(LF + HF) ratio suggested potential involvement of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in PSH pathogenesis. The SVM classifier achieved perfect classification during the event. In addition, 10 min prior to onset, the model reached 67% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 83% balanced accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: HRV analysis reveals distinct autonomic signatures preceding PSH and suggests, as a working hypothesis, that dysregulation of the RAAS may play a role. However, VLF power is influenced by multiple mechanisms and cannot be considered a specific or exclusive marker of RAAS activity. SVM-based predictive modeling offers a promising tool for PSH detection, providing a basis for investigating autonomic/neuroendocrine regulation, including RAAS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".