MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117155351 · doi:10.1002/alz70855_100373

The interplay between synaptic integrity and age at menopause on Alzheimer's disease risk in women

2025· article· en· W7117155351 on OpenAlexaff
Madeline Wood Alexander, William G Honer, Rowan Saloner, Liisa A.M. Galea, David A. A. Bennett, Jennifer S Rabin, Kaitlin B Casaletto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMenopauseDiseaseCognitionPsychological interventionEndocrine systemPsychological resilienceResilience (materials science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Early menopause increases Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk in women. Synaptic dysfunction incites and exacerbates AD progression. We investigated whether synergism between age at menopause and synaptic integrity influence AD neuropathology and cognitive trajectories in women. METHOD: We used autopsy and clinical data from the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Presynaptic proteins were measured across 6 cortical regions using immunoassays. We examined presynaptic terminal integrity via average levels of complexin-I and complexin-II, and presynaptic terminal functionality via average SNARE protein-protein interactions. Age at spontaneous menopause was self-reported. β-amyloid and tau tangles were quantified with immunohistochemistry across 8 brain regions, and regional scores were averaged to produce summary measures. Cognition was assessed annually with neuropsychological tests, and standardized scores were averaged to compute a composite score of global cognition. Linear and mixed effects models tested interactive effects age at menopause and synaptic biomarkers on β-amyloid, tau, and cognitive decline, adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: We included 268 women with spontaneous menopause (age at menopause=49.2±4.9; baseline age=83.7±5.9; age at death=90.9±5.9). For tau models, there were interactions of age at menopause with complexin-I (β=0.070, p = .0002) and SNARE functionality (β=0.045, p = .02), but not complexin-II (β=0.034, p = .13), such that earlier age at menopause exacerbated the associations of reduced synaptic integrity with elevated tau (Figure 1). There were no interactions of age at menopause with any synaptic biomarkers on β-amyloid (ps>.15). For cognitive models, there were interactions between age at menopause and all three synaptic biomarkers (complexin-I: β=-0.008, p = .002; complexin-II: β=-0.006, p = .05; SNARE protein-protein interactions: β=-0.006, p = .01), such that women with earlier menopause exhibited stronger associations between reduced synaptic integrity and cognitive decline (Figure 2). Post hoc analyses suggested that the interactive associations of age at menopause and synaptic biomarkers on tau and cognitive decline were attenuated in women with a history of hormone therapy. CONCLUSION: In the setting of reduced synaptic integrity, women with earlier menopause show greater tau and steeper cognitive decline. These findings suggest that midlife endocrine processes or their sequelae modify the links between late-life synaptic integrity and brain health outcomes. Interventions targeting both factors could promote resilience to AD in women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→