MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact of 2’-fluoro nucleobase modifications on CD detection, sensitivity and specificity of short oligonucleotides bound to alginate hydrogels

2025· article· W7117156515 on OpenAlexafffund
Daisee Lubrin, Colin Elliott, Jean‐Paul Desaulniers, Theresa Stotesbury

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiosensorOligonucleotideNucleobaseDNAOligomer restrictionSelf-healing hydrogelsNucleic acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical modification of oligonucleotides has aided in the advancement of various therapeutic applications; however, their impact on biosensor performance remains understudied. As demand grows for rapid, sensitive, and portable detection technologies in healthcare, environmental, and forensic fields, leveraging the effects of chemical modifications with spectroscopic detection methods offers an opportunity to improve biosensor performance. Herein, we synthesize label-free oligonucleotide-bound alginate hydrogels as biosensors and use circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy to detect and confirm DNA and RNA hybridization without amplification or labelling. We particularly focus on the impact of 2’-fluoro modifications on biosensor sensitivity and specificity. Fluorine-modified DNA-based biosensors demonstrate more than a threefold increase in sensitivity compared to unmodified DNA. RNA-based biosensors displayed a similar trend, where 2’-fluoro nucleobase modifications significantly lowered the LOD. Biosensor specificity is evaluated by adding mixtures containing up to four non-complementary strands to the alginate-oligo hydrogels. Fluorine-modified biosensors consistently demonstrated greater specificity with more distinct shifts in CD spectra compared to unmodified DNA. Principal component analysis was applied to differentiated samples with and without a bound complement. Additionally, when thermal melt data was combined with CD spectral data it was possible with a random forest model to predict whether unknown samples demonstrated complement binding, with accuracies of 95 % and 83% for 2’-F modified and unmodified oligos, respectively. Our findings highlight the enhancement in biosensor sensitivity and specificity conferred by 2’-fluoro modifications, demonstrating their potential for improved label-free, amplification-free detection of oligonucleotides in complex environmental and forensic samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxiv→Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→