MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117158237 · doi:10.1186/s40337-025-01497-3

Improving body image in female Chinese social media users with eating disorder symptoms: a randomized controlled trial of two online self-guided single-session interventions

2025· article· en· W7117158237 on OpenAlexaff
Y Cheng, Yuhan Chen, Wesley R. Barnhart, Chun Chen, See Heng Yim, Jason M. Nagata, Feng Ji, Jinbo He

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Eating Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSocial mediaRandomized controlled trialPsychological interventionEating disordersSocial comparison theoryeHealth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social media use is a risk factor for eating and body image disturbances. The overlap between social media and eating and body image disturbances is particularly concerning in the Chinese context given an estimated billion active social media users in China, especially among females. This highlights the need for scalable, culturally adapted prevention and intervention strategies. This study developed and evaluated two online, self-guided, single-session interventions (SSIs), including a Media Literacy Intervention (MLI) and a Body Functionality-focused expressive writing Intervention (BFI), alongside waitlist controls, and examined their ability to improve body image among adult female Chinese social media users with eating disorder (ED) symptoms. A total of 204 female social media users with ED symptoms were recruited via Xiaohongshu (Little Red Note) and randomized to the MLI (n = 68), BFI (n = 68), or waitlist control group (n = 68). Primary outcomes included measures of negative and positive body image. Secondary outcomes included a range of measures including ED psychopathology and psychological distress. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 4 weeks after baseline. Both MLI and BFI interventions significantly outperformed the waitlist control on primary and secondary outcomes. The two interventions demonstrated comparable efficacy across most domains, except for eating flexibility, where BFI yielded greater improvements. Intervention uptake was high (93%), and most participants (95%) reported they would recommend the intervention to others. SSIs show promise as accessible, acceptable, and effective tools for improving body image and reducing ED symptoms among Chinese female social media users with ED symptoms. Future research should conduct larger-scale studies to examine their effectiveness and long-term impact. Social media use is associated with body image concerns and increased risk of eating disorders. We developed two culturally adapted, self-guided online programs delivered via WeChat: a Media Literacy Intervention (MLI) and a Body Functionality Intervention (BFI). In a randomized controlled trial with 204 female social media users experiencing eating disorder symptoms, both interventions significantly improved body image and reduced eating disorder symptoms and psychological distress at follow-ups, compared to a control group. The interventions were highly acceptable, with 95% of participants indicating they would recommend them to others. These results suggest that brief, accessible online programs may be effective in improving body image, eating behaviors, and general mental health among female social media users with eating disorder symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Eating DisordersSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207