Benchmarking the AI‐based diagnostic potential of plasma proteomics for neurodegenerative disease in 17,710 people
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plasma proteomic biomarkers have shown significant potential for accurate and cost-effective dementia diagnosis. However, plasma proteomic has not been validated for multi-disease diagnosis in large neurodegenerative cohorts yet. This study develops AI models on data from the Global Neurodegeneration Proteomics Consortium (GNPC) to predict major forms of dementia, accounting for multiple underlying pathologies, and outputting probabilistic information. METHOD: This study included 17,170 GNPC participants with SomaLogic 7K plasma proteomics, comprising controls and patients with AD, PD, FTD, ALS, or Stroke (Figure 1A). We describe 'ProtAIDe', a deep network for six clinical diagnostic categories classification using proteomics (Figure 1B). 10-fold cross-validation with built-in feature selection was used to evaluate overall performance. Leave-one-site-out scheme, with and without k-shot fine-tuning, was adopted to evaluate out-of-site generalization performance. Additionally, baseline proteomics embeddings from ProtAIDe's last layer were leveraged to predict longitudinal CDR progression (advancing from CDR 0 to >0). Predicted probabilities were validated against cognition and APOE genotype, and the cross-disease classification probability space was visualized using 2-dimensional t-SNE. Predictive importance of individual proteins was estimated by feature permutation. RESULT: ProtAIDe achieved simultaneous balanced classification accuracy (BCA) >0.7 and AUC >0.8 across all six targets (Figure 1C) with ∼200 proteins. Performance dipped when generalizing to unseen sites, though it was partially recovered by finetuning (Figure 2A). Despite being trained only on baseline data, ProtAIDe's baseline embeddings predicted longitudinal CDR progression with an AUC of 0.76±0.09 (N = 2052; Figure 2B). AD classification probability showed a strong anti-correlation (R = -0.63) with MMSE score (Figure 2C) and reflected the protective and risk qualities of the APOE ɛ2 and ɛ4 alleles, respectively (Figure 2D). t-SNE visualization of probability spaces (Figure 2E) revealed unique (multiple PD and FTD clusters) and shared (middle regions shared by AD, Control, FTD, and Stroke) clustering patterns among neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting potential comorbidities. Key proteins emerged as major contributors to single- or multi-disease classifications (Figure 3). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that ∼200 key proteins in blood can differentiate major forms of dementia at the patient-level. ProtAIDe's probabilistic information highlights its potential for identifying co-pathologies and determining proteins driving symptoms at the individual-level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".