MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117167655 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_099373

Benchmarking the AI‐based diagnostic potential of plasma proteomics for neurodegenerative disease in 17,710 people

2025· article· en· W7117167655 on OpenAlexaff
Lijun An, Yu Xiao, Inès Hristovska, Shinya Tasaki, Bart Smets, Ying Xu, Varsha Krish, Farhad Imam, Erik Stomrud, Shorena Janelidze, Sebastian Palmqvist, Alexa Pichet Binette, Rik Ossenkoppele, Niklas Mattsson‐Carlgren, Oskar H. Hansson, Jacob W. Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseProteomicsBenchmarkingNeurodegenerationDementiaDegenerative disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Plasma proteomic biomarkers have shown significant potential for accurate and cost-effective dementia diagnosis. However, plasma proteomic has not been validated for multi-disease diagnosis in large neurodegenerative cohorts yet. This study develops AI models on data from the Global Neurodegeneration Proteomics Consortium (GNPC) to predict major forms of dementia, accounting for multiple underlying pathologies, and outputting probabilistic information. METHOD: This study included 17,170 GNPC participants with SomaLogic 7K plasma proteomics, comprising controls and patients with AD, PD, FTD, ALS, or Stroke (Figure 1A). We describe 'ProtAIDe', a deep network for six clinical diagnostic categories classification using proteomics (Figure 1B). 10-fold cross-validation with built-in feature selection was used to evaluate overall performance. Leave-one-site-out scheme, with and without k-shot fine-tuning, was adopted to evaluate out-of-site generalization performance. Additionally, baseline proteomics embeddings from ProtAIDe's last layer were leveraged to predict longitudinal CDR progression (advancing from CDR 0 to >0). Predicted probabilities were validated against cognition and APOE genotype, and the cross-disease classification probability space was visualized using 2-dimensional t-SNE. Predictive importance of individual proteins was estimated by feature permutation. RESULT: ProtAIDe achieved simultaneous balanced classification accuracy (BCA) >0.7 and AUC >0.8 across all six targets (Figure 1C) with ∼200 proteins. Performance dipped when generalizing to unseen sites, though it was partially recovered by finetuning (Figure 2A). Despite being trained only on baseline data, ProtAIDe's baseline embeddings predicted longitudinal CDR progression with an AUC of 0.76±0.09 (N = 2052; Figure 2B). AD classification probability showed a strong anti-correlation (R = -0.63) with MMSE score (Figure 2C) and reflected the protective and risk qualities of the APOE ɛ2 and ɛ4 alleles, respectively (Figure 2D). t-SNE visualization of probability spaces (Figure 2E) revealed unique (multiple PD and FTD clusters) and shared (middle regions shared by AD, Control, FTD, and Stroke) clustering patterns among neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting potential comorbidities. Key proteins emerged as major contributors to single- or multi-disease classifications (Figure 3). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that ∼200 key proteins in blood can differentiate major forms of dementia at the patient-level. ProtAIDe's probabilistic information highlights its potential for identifying co-pathologies and determining proteins driving symptoms at the individual-level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207