MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ON THE ISSUE OF DETERMINING A CHILD'S NATIONALITY: NATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL, AND FOREIGN LEGAL REGULATORY MECHANISMS

2025· article· W7117238638 on OpenAlex
Dana Abdizhapparovna Abdakimova, Izzatullo Habibullo Saidzoda, Marzhangul Akimzhanova

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiscrimination and Equality Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationNationalityLegislatureHuman rightsInternational lawStatutory lawMultinational corporationState (computer science)The Republic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article is devoted to a comprehensive study of the legal mechanism for determining a child's nationality in light of constitutional guarantees and international human rights standards. The purpose of the study is to identify problems and systemic contradictions between the current norms of the national legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the international obligations of the state in the area of ensuring the child's right to ethnic self-identification. The analysis is based on the provisions of the Constitution, regulatory decisions of the Constitutional Court, the Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan «On Marriage (Matrimony) and Family», and international treaties ratified by the Republic of Kazakhstan. To ensure completeness and objectivity, the experience of the CIS countries and non-CIS countries was analysed, in particular, the legal consolidation of national identity in Israel and Bosnia and Herzegovina - countries in which constitutions formalize the special status of «titular» nations. The experience of Canada and Belgium was considered, whose legislative practice allows us to assess the risks of applying a similar model in multinational states, including Kazakhstan. The study found that the automatic determination of nationality based on the origin of parents creates the preconditions for discrimination, especially in relation to orphans and stateless persons, and substantiated that the existing regulatory model requires revision in order to ensure the voluntary nature of ethnic self-identification and prevent confusion between the concepts of nationality and citizenship. The study is based on a combination of general scientific and specialized methods: deduction, historical, comparative legal, and systemic analysis, case studies, and a doctrinal approach. The empirical basis was formed by the normative legal acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan, international legal documents (including the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness), as well as decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and materials of law enforcement practice of the CIS states. The results of the study can be used for further reform of family and marriage legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The results of the conducted research may be useful for the scientific community, legislative bodies, and human rights organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.686

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it