MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117239239 · doi:10.21083/caree.v1i1.8944

Dual Challenge of Climate Change and Misinformation: How Misinformation Shapes Vulnerability and Adaptation in Rural Communities in Pakistan

2025· article· W7117239239 on OpenAlexaff
N. R. Khan, Ataharul Chowdhury

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Agri-food & Rural Advisory Extension and Education Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMisinformationFocus groupClimate changeVulnerability (computing)LivelihoodPsychological resilienceThematic analysisAdaptive capacityRisk perceptionClimate risk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

South Asia is among the world’s most climate-vulnerable regions, with rural farming communities facing increasing exposure to climatic stressors and constrained adaptive capacity. In Pakistan, where agriculture remains the primary livelihood for a large rural population, adaptation to climate change depends not only on economic and institutional resources but also on access to credible climate information. This study examines how misinformation influences climate risk perception, perceived vulnerability, and adaptive decision-making among smallholder farmers in Punjab, Pakistan. The study is grounded in the Model of Proactive Private Adaptation to Climate Change (MPPACC) and extends this framework by conceptualizing misinformation as a cognitive and structural barrier embedded within farmers’ information environments. A mixed-methods research design was employed in Dera Ghazi Khan, a socially marginalized and climate-sensitive district. Quantitative data were collected through a household survey of 202 farming households and analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression analysis. Qualitative data were generated through five focus group discussions and ten key informant interviews with extension agents, community leaders, and local intermediaries and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings show that misinformation distorts farmers’ perceptions of climate trends and risks, leading to misinterpretation of climatic changes. Exposure to misinformation contributes to heightened perceived vulnerability, fatalism, and declining trust in institutional actors, which together weaken adaptive capacity and reduce the adoption of climate-smart practices. By integrating misinformation into the MPPACC framework, the study advances adaptation theory and highlights the need to strengthen extension services, promote literacy, and treat information systems as a component of resilience policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Agri-food & Rural Advisory Extension and Education JournalSame topicClimate Change Communication and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207