MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117239698 · doi:10.1145/3786588

MSDA-Net: Multi-source Domain Adaptive Network for Multi-modal Emotion Recognition

2025· article· en· W7117239698 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsFeature (linguistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Emotion recognitionFeature extractionDomain (mathematical analysis)Feature learningJoint (building)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electroencephalogram (EEG) has shown g reat potential in multi-modal emotion recognition (MER) due to its ability to directly capture emotional states. However, the nonstationarity of EEG signals leads to significant variations across subjects and sessions, posing challenges for subject-independent MER. While previous methods have made significant progress, they often fail to integrate multimodal signals into transfer learning frameworks effectively. To address this limitation, we propose a Multi-source Domain Adaptive Network (MSDA-Net) for MER, designed to mitigate cross-subject and cross-session distribution shifts and enhance recognition performance. Specifically, we first design a feature alignment module to integrate features from different modalities, generating cross-modal feature representations and extracting representative shared features. To further improve generalization, we incorporate domain-specific feature extractors to capture domain-invariant emotional representations. Additionally, we introduce an adapter module to adjust the feature representations between different modalities, aiming to capture inter-individual differences and cross-modal correlations better. Finally, we unify classification loss, discrepancy loss, and maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) loss into a joint optimization framework. Abundant experiments on the SEED and SEED-IV datasets demonstrate the superiority of MSDA-Net, highlighting its effectiveness in improving MER performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it