MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117243053 · doi:10.14740/jocmr6371

Machine Learning-Based Model to Classify Emergency Severity Index Levels 1-3 in Febrile Patients With Tachycardia: Thailand Triage Prediction System

2025· article· en· W7117243053 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Chanitda Wicha, Thanin Lokeskrawee, Sagoontee Inkate, Natthaphon Pruksathorn, Jarupa Yaowalaorng, Suppachai Lawanaskol, Jayanton Patumanond, Suwapim Chanlaor, Wanwisa Bumrungpagdee, Chawalit Lakdee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriageIndex (typography)Emergency departmentDecision support system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Febrile patients with tachycardia present diverse profiles that complicate triage. Although the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) is widely used in Thailand, inter-rater variability limits consistency. Machine learning (ML) may enhance reliability using routinely collected triage data. The objectives were to develop and evaluate ML models predicting ESI levels 1-3 in febrile tachycardic adults and identify the best model for clinical use. Methods: This diagnostic prediction study analyzed adults with fever (≥ 37.6 °C) and pulse rate > 100 beats per minute in the triage area of Lampang Hospital, Thailand, during June - August 2024. Patients with complete data were included, whereas referrals and expert-disagreement cases were excluded. Expert-assigned ESI levels were the outcome. Thirteen routinely collected triage variables were evaluated as candidate predictors. The dataset (n = 500) was randomly split 80:20 into development and testing sets. Random forest, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and gradient boosting machine models were developed using five-fold cross-validation with class-weighting for imbalance correction. Performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AuROC), calibration, and confusion matrices, with attention to clinically relevant misclassification. Results: XGBoost demonstrated the best discrimination with AuROC values of 1.00 (confidence interval (CI): 0.99 - 1.00), 0.94 (CI: 0.89 - 0.98), and 0.97 (CI: 0.93 - 1.00) for ESI levels 1-3 in the test set. Calibration showed the lowest Brier scores, and misclassification was minimal, supporting strong predictive consistency across categories. Conclusions: XGBoost was selected for integration into the Smart ER system as the Thailand Triage Prediction System (TTPS), providing real-time prediction to enhance triage accuracy, support decision-making, and improve workflow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research→Same topicEmergency and Acute Care Studies→French-language works237,207→