Human Herpes Virus 6 Seroprevalence in pediatric leukemia: A case-control Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates the incidence of primary infections and reactivations of the HHV-6 virus in pediatric leukemia patients, and their possible role in the disease course or in contributing to immunosuppression. Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) Primary Infections and Reactivation in Children with Leukemia: A Clinical and Epidemiological Study” illustrates the gaps and problems in the research of HHV-6 viruses in children with leukemia which was the case in the United States and shows the defects in the use of clinics and hospital laboratories and the possible contribution of the systematic research of the pediatric oncology clinic in children suffering from leukemia aiming pediatric population of the country was the first step in Canadian leukemia and HHV-6 viruses in children. The present case-control study analyzed a total of blood samples. The case group comprised of children aged 1-13 years who were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with a sample size of 50. The control group had 50 children who were matched by age and sex with the case group and were healthy without any personal or familial history of hematological malignancies or viral illness. The collected samples were centrifuged and the sera were stored at 4 degrees Celsius till the analysis. hhv-6 specific IgG antibodies were assessed by the EL1SA technique. The mean serum level of HHV-6-specific IgG antibodies was significantly higher in the leukemia group (77.67 ± 21.79) compared to the control group (14.89 ± 2.93), and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Our findings indicate a higher prevalence of HHV-6 infection among pediatric leukemia patients. This may reflect viral reactivation due to immunosuppression rather than a direct oncogenic role for the virus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".