Small Molecule Targeting of Chaperone {IP Protein} Prevents and Reverses TDP‐43 Aggregation In‐vitro and In‐vivo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nuclear depletion and neuronal cytoplasmic aggregation of the transactive response DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is observed in up to 95% amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) cases, 70% of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) cases, and 50% of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cases. The cytoplasmic aggregation of TDP-43 has been correlated with inducing neuronal loss. As such, preventing TDP-43 aggregation could have therapeutic potential for ALS/FTD and associated diseases. It has been shown that aggregation of TDP-43 can be attenuated by chaperone proteins. Herein, we have identificatied and validated a new small molecule 'JRMS' as potent binder of {IP-protein} which upregulates its non-canonical chaperone function to prevent/reverse TDP-43 aggregation. METHOD: We developed high throughput models of TDP-43 aggregation by expressing the highly aggregation prone C-terminal fragment TDP-25 in cells through transient expression, mouse primary cortical neurons through lentiviral expression, and organotypic slices and mouse model through AAV9 expression. RESULT: Acute and chronic treatment of JRMS reduced TDP-25 aggregation in a dose-dependent manner by ∼75% in cells. This reduction of TDP-25 aggregates was validated to be dependent on {IP-protein}, and that JRMS elevates activity of the target {IP-protein}. Similarly, in mouse primary cortical neurons transduced with TDP-25 lentivirus, JRMS reduced TDP-25 aggregates by ∼50% reduction. We screened JRMS on organotypic slices from 10 day-old mice inoculated with AAV9-TDP-25. Over 7-days, DMSO treated slices showed ∼60% increase, while JRMS treatment showed a ∼20% reduction in number of TDP-25 aggregates observed prior to treatment. Finally, two weeks treatments of AAV9-TDP-25 expressing mice at 6 weeks of age with JRMS exhibited ∼30% reduction in number of aggregates compared to DMSO control. CONCLUSION: We have validated JRMS as a preclinical therapeutic candidate for the treatment of TDP-43 proteinopathy, with additional preliminary evidence for Tauopathies as well. We are currently working on building a Target Product Profile (TPP) with the goal of providing a drug(s) for clinical testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".