Preface: 4th International Conference on Theoretical Physics, Computers and Electronic Engineering (TPCEE 2025)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This volume contains papers accepted by the 2025 4th International Conference on Theoretical Physics, Computers and Electronic Engineering (TPCEE 2025), which was held at Toronto, Canada during October 25-26, 2025. This conference brought together innovative scholars and industry experts to jointly hold a forum. The main objective of the conference is to promote the research and development activities of theoretical physics, astrophysics, quantum physics, computer engineering, information technology, and electronic engineering. The other objective is to promote the exchange of scientific information among researchers, developers, engineers, students, and practitioners around the world. Over 50 participants from many countries attended this conference, which included 4 keynote speeches and 20 oral presentations on different aspects in 4 sections. The cutting-edge research works were presented by such renowned keynote speakers. The TPCEE 2025 was a success where all the participants gathered on this platform and share experiences and research findings in their respective fields. Organizing Committees of TPCEE 2025 Toronto, Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it