Pneumatic vibrotactile display using speakers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we developed a pneumatic vibrotactile display that uses sound pressure from a speaker to generate changes in air pressure, which is transmitted to the fingertip via a silicone tube to enable the presentation of vibrations over a wide bandwidth. Generally, pneumatic vibrotactile displays using air compressors have difficulty in presenting vibrations in high frequency bands, especially above 200 Hz, due to limitations in the response speed and control performance of the open/close valve. For this reason, this study attempted to construct a system that can handle a wider range of frequencies by taking advantage of the high responsiveness of the speaker. Specifically, by transmitting air pressure vibrations generated by changes in the speaker’s sound pressure to the fingertips through silicon tubes, this system enables the presentation of tactile stimuli that include high-frequency components, which has been difficult with the conventional air compressor system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it