Enhancing Accuracy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Genetic Disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Discovery and Engineering of Retrons for Precise Genome Editing The challenges of currently available genome editing techniques are mainly lack of precision of double-stranded breaks, lack of targeted delivery and efficient repair, and genotoxicity. The study by Buffington et al. on identification and engineering of retrons to improve their efficiency in mammalian cell lines and vertebrates, helps to address these challenges.[1] Retrons produce single-stranded DNA which are found in bacteria as a part of their defense system. The investigators used metagenomic analysis and screening by confocal imaging, flow cytometry, and next-generation sequencing in human embryonic kidney cells to select active retrons, among which Efe1-RT was found to be highly precise and efficient across different loci. With the same approach, the plasmid was optimized by nuclear localization signal (NLS) and linker engineering. The investigators found high activity with N- and C-terminal (BP-SV40) NLSs, (SGGS) 2 linker, nonhomologous end joining inhibitors and homology-directed repair (HDR)-promting fusions. They proved cross-compatibility with Cas12a, Cas12a Ultra, and Cas9 nickase, which demonstrated the ability to bypass the need for a DNA double-strand break for gene editing. The strategy of using all RNA delivery to enable DNA-free gene editing in cells and vertebrates like the zebrafish model, was also established. Through bridging bacterial retrons and eukaryotic genome engineering, retron editors have been proven to be versatile and precise tools. An Enhanced Eco1 Retron Editor Enables Precision Genome Engineering in Human Cells without Double-strand Breaks Bacterial retroelements called retrons have become new tools for precise DNA editing. However, in mammalian cells, the efficiency is uncertain. Cattle et al. have identified and addressed the major limitations in retron-based editing.[2] The team fused Eco1 retron to Cas9 and used reporter mCherry to check the transfection; catalytically dead RT was used as a control. Noncoding RNA (ncRNA) plasmids were designed with a 100-nt insert between the multicopy single-stranded DNA and RNA (msd and msr) regions. Retron ncRNAs or sgRNAs encoded by separate plasmids were expressed from the U6 RNAPIII promoter and terminated by a poly (T) transcription termination signal. The ncRNA stability is achieved using an exoribonuclease-resistant RNA (xrRNA) pseudoknot at the 5' end and a poly (A) tail. The team demonstrated that Csy4 endoribonuclease cleaves the transcript giving the sgRNA a natural 5′ start. Efficient editing in human cells with a nickase Cas9 version (Cas9 H840A) and genome editing with single-stranded nick was successfully demonstrated by the team. This study demonstrates the improved editing outcomes achieved by stabilizing ncRNA and correcting sgRNA processing. ThinkRare: A Search Algorithm to Identify Patients with Undiagnosed Rare Genetic Disease in an Electronic Medical Record The diagnosis of rare genetic disorders is often missed in routine clinical practice. Addressing this issue, the team of Ediae et al. developed a search-based algorithm called “ThinkRare” designed to flag undiagnosed and suspected rare diseases.[3] Retrospective electronic medical records (EMR) from the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario over the past 20 years were analyzed, and clinical details and comprehensive information about laboratory tests was obtained. First, potential EMR data fields that can be used for the algorithm were identified, and a gold-standard dataset was created of patients with certain criteria. An artificial intelligence-based algorithm version was developed; multiple versions of the algorithm were optimized using a test dataset, which is a prospective application of real-world data. Random sampling and different sampling inputs to different versions were used. The team manually validated the output data into true positives and false positives. The specificity and negative predictive value were calculated from the final version of the search tool. Finally, the data generated by the algorithm were statistically validated. The result of using this “ThinkRare” among 262,296 patients was that the algorithm achieved 60% sensitivity and 15% precision, indicating a need for further refinement to improve precision when maintaining sensitivity. Efforts toward applying this kind of search tool to national-level available data are required for a better understanding of rare genetic disorders and to provide proper diagnostic testing options to patients. Toward Same-day Genome Sequencing in the Critical Care Setting In critical and crucial conditions like neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), rapid genetic diagnosis is essential. The challenge lies in compressing preanalytical, analytical, and interpretive steps into a single-day workflow. However, very fast genome sequencing methods demonstrated in other studies prove to be expensive, low-throughput, and impractical for routine use. Wojcik et al. evaluated new technology using the expansion method for sequencing.[4] In this method, nanopore sequencing alongside real-time data analysis is done where VCF can be generated in 30 min after sequencing. The team piloted this method in 15 infants, with the parents’ consent. Out of 15 genomes, 3 were reference genomes (HG220), 5 were from previously diagnosed patients, and 7 were test subjects. In parallel, the samples were rapidly sequenced by a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments laboratory to validate the results of sequencing by expansion. The average time for the report was 4 h and 4 min, significantly faster than traditional genome sequencing methods, which can take several days. Of the seven test subjects, two had diagnostic findings and five had negative reports. Among the positive cases, one had multiple anomalies, and an unbalanced chromosomal translocation was reported. This method is scalable, fast, and suitable for critical care decisions, enabling NICU diagnostics to achieve true same-day precision medicine. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".