6G-Oriented LDPC-Coded Faster-Than-Nyquist Signaling: Code Design and Performance Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on the design and performance analysis of faster-than-Nyquist (FTN) signaling employing enhanced 5G low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, oriented toward the requirements of future 6G systems. We propose the extrinsic information transfer (EXIT) chart analysis for the LDPC-coded FTN system based on the Ungerboeck observation model, where the input-output mutual information function of the detector is approximated using least squares fitting. With the proposed EXIT chart analysis, we explore the thresholds and decoding performance of different LDPC codes (regular codes, irregular codes and protograph codes) in both Nyquist and FTN systems, revealing two important observational findings for FTN signaling: 1) Unlike Nyquist systems, where certain 5G New Radio (NR)-like information puncturing can enhance the decoding threshold and performance, we observe that in the FTN setting considered in this paper such puncturing leads to performance degradation; 2) Unlike Nyquist systems, the paritycheck matrix of LDPC codes optimized for FTN signaling tends to be relatively sparser within comparable ensembles, due to the intentionally introduced inter-symbol interference (ISI). Based on these findings, we develop tailored LDPC codes for FTN signaling by applying the masking operation to the base matrix of the standard 5G LDPC codes, aiming to achieve a lower decoding threshold and thereby better decoding performance. Moreover, the raptor-like structure and rate compatibility are preserved in the proposed LDPC codes, and the encoder and decoder are reused with only minor modifications. Numerical results show that: 1) All simulation results align with the decoding thresholds obtained by the proposed EXIT chart analysis, confirming the effectiveness of the analysis; 2) For the FTN system, the tailored LDPC codes outperform standard 5G LDPC codes, achieving over 0.4 dB coding gain and approaching (slightly exceeding) the constrained Nyquist capacity; 3) Under the same spectral efficiency, FTN with tailored LDPC codes performs better than standard 5G LDPC codes with Nyquist signaling, demonstrating a coding gain of up to 0.6 dB; 4) The proposed LDPC codes with the FTN signaling achieve better performance compared to existing high-performance codes specifically designed for FTN signaling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".