MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117254346 · doi:10.1134/s1022795425701236

Coevolution of Thermoreceptor Genes of the TRP Family in 15 Populations of the Altai-Sayan Region, Western Siberia, and the Far East

2025· article· en· W7117254346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. A. Gubina, V. N. Babenko, A. Yu. Gubina

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Journal of Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlleleCoevolutionGeneAllele frequencyPopulationPolymorphism (computer science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The analysis of the TRPV3 thermoreceptor gene (rs322937) was carried out in 15 population samples (1503 people) belonging to different language groups living in the regions of the Altai-Sayan Highlands, Western Siberia, the Far East, and Canada. The highest frequency of the rare allele was found in the Yakuts (42.9%), and the lowest in the Eskimos (10.7%) and Evenks (10.8%). Deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were found in the population of Siberian Tatars. The greatest interpopulation differences were found between the Yakuts and Evenks, and the smallest were found between the Kazakhs, Telengits, and Khakass, the Telengits and Tatars, the Khakass and Nanai, and the Tuvans and Northern Altaians. Transassociation of polymorphic loci of the TRPV1, TRPA1, TRPM8, and TRPV3 genes was carried out using the method of regression analysis. Of the six pairs, a positive correlation was found in three: TRPA1/TRPV3, TRPV3/TRPV1, and TRPV1/TRPM8. Thus, the TRPV3 gene studied by us is positively correlated with TRPV1 and TRPA1 and negatively with TRPM8. The results obtained may indicate different selective pressure in different geographical areas determined by climatic factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Journal of GeneticsSame topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207