MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117256474 · doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c05286

Macro-Textured Fabric Reduces Water Droplet Impact Contact Time

2025· article· en· W7117256474 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicole T. Furtak, Shuo Lin Wu, Samuel Au, Adrian Lai, Rob Gathercole, Kevin Golovin

Bibliographic record

VenueLangmuir · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSurface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsWettingContact angleFumed silicaFabric structureTextileContact areaRidge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reducing fabric wetting by minimizing the contact time of impacting droplets is beneficial in many textile applications, such as rainwear and personal protective equipment. Macro-texturing of rigid superhydrophobic surfaces is a technique to reduce droplet impact contact time that has not previously been applied to textiles. This study examines utilizing inherently macro-textured superhydrophobic fabrics to reduce the contact time of impacting water droplets, adjusting the fabric topography through stretching and gathering to optimize the macro-texture. Fabrics were finished with either a commercial superhydrophobic finish or a developed superhydrophobic formulation utilizing fumed silica nanoparticles and poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) brushes. Various droplet splitting impact behaviors were observed and depended on the impact site and geometry of the macro-textured fabric. A 2:1 gathering ratio on woven seersucker fabric provided a 52% decrease from the theoretical minimum contact time for droplet impact on a ridge site. Rigid 3D-printed superhydrophobic surfaces that mimicked the fabric topography provide a useful analogue to the fabric surface for fine-tuning fabric designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLangmuirSame topicSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityFrench-language works237,207