Wearable EEG monitoring reveals changes in rapid eye movement sleep in mild cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Identifying reliable early biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical for developing effective preventive strategies. Sleep disturbances, particularly in slow wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, have been linked to AD pathology, including amyloid deposition and basal forebrain degeneration-changes that occur years before the onset of dementia. Several in-lab polysomnography (PSG) studies indicate that deficits in SWS and REM sleep emerge early in the course of AD, notably in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, limited accessibility, high costs, and poor patient tolerance significantly hinder the widespread adoption of PSG in both research and clinical settings. Wearable electroencephalography (EEG) offers a more feasible alternative for assessing sleep architecture in the home environment. Here, we used wearable EEG to assess changes in sleep stages in MCI and investigate their association with cognitive functioning. METHOD: A preliminary cohort of 7 patients with MCI due to probable AD and 13 age-matched cognitively healthy controls underwent at-home sleep monitoring for up to six consecutive nights using the Sleep Profiler headband, a single-channel frontal EEG device. Global cognitive functioning was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Sleep was scored using the U-Sleep deep learning algorithm, validated against technician-scored PSG data. Sleep stages were compared between groups and correlated with MoCA scores. Data collection is ongoing and further data will be presented at the conference. RESULT: Patients with MCI spent a significantly lower percentage of their total sleep time in REM sleep compared to controls (p = 0.043, d = 1.021), and reduced REM sleep percentage was significantly associated with lower MoCA scores (p = 0.040). No other sleep stages differed between the groups. CONCLUSION: Reduced REM sleep, which is detectable using wearable EEG, may serve as an early biomarker of AD and is associated with cognitive decline. These findings highlight the potential of non-invasive, at-home sleep monitoring for identifying those at the earliest symptomatic stage of AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".