Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vision Transformers have shown tremendous success in numerous computer vision applications; however, they have not been exploited for stress assessment using physiological signals such as Electrocardiogram (ECG). In order to get the maximum benefit from the vision transformer for multilevel stress assessment, in this paper, we transform the raw ECG data into 2D spectrograms using short time Fourier transform (STFT). These spectrograms are divided into patches for feeding to the transformer encoder. We also perform experiments with 1D CNN and ResNet-18 (CNN model). We perform leave-one-subject-out cross validation (LOSOCV) experiments on WESAD and Ryerson Multimedia Lab (RML) dataset. One of the biggest challenges of LOSOCV based experiments is to tackle the problem of intersubject variability. In this research, we address the issue of intersubject variability and show our success using 2D spectrograms and the attention mechanism of transformer. Experiments show that vision transformer handles the effect of intersubject variability much better than CNN-based models and beats all previous state-of-the-art methods by a considerable margin. Moreover, our method is end-to-end, does not require handcrafted features, and can learn robust representations. The proposed method achieved 71.01% and 76.7% accuracies with RML dataset and WESAD dataset respectively for three class classification and 88.3% for binary classification on WESAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".