MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117260367 · doi:10.1002/alz70855_107129

Hypercaloric diet modulates hippocampal electrophysiological responses in a rat model of Alzheimer's Disease

2025· article· en· W7117260367 on OpenAlexaff
Andrea Trevisiol, Dustin Loren V. Almanza, Margaret M. Koletar, Aaron Y. Lai, Mary Hill, Greg J. Stanisz, JoAnne McLaurin, Dr Bojana Stefanovic

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of TorontoHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHippocampal formationElectrophysiologyRat modelDiseasePremovement neuronal activityAnimal model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by impaired glucose metabolism, leading to neuronal energy deficits and disrupted neuronal network activity. Interventions aimed at normalizing metabolism are thus garnering increased research interest. Given that obesity is a known comorbidity of AD, we investigated how exposure to a high-calorie, high-fat (HCHF) diet affects neuronal function in the established stage of AD pathology in the TgF344-AD rats. METHOD: TgF344-AD (TgAD) and wild-type (nTg) rats were fed either a standard chow diet; or a standard chow with a rotating set of HCHF diet items. After 3 months on the diet, neuronal activity in the somatosensory cortex and hippocampus was simultaneously recorded using Neuropixels electrodes. Local field potentials (LFPs) and spiking activity were analyzed at rest and in response to a 3Hz electrical stimulation of the forepaw. We reported stimulus-evoked changes in spectral power, phase-amplitude coupling (modulation index, MI), and spiking rate to evaluate how the HCHF diet modulates neuronal activity and network dynamics in the presence/absence of the transgenes. RESULT: LFPs of chow-fed TgAD rats exhibited reduced resting alpha power and attenuated stimulation-induced power increases (in delta, theta, and alpha bands) compared to nTg rats. HCHF feeding restored resting theta and alpha power in TgAD rats and enhanced stimulus-induced power changes across delta, theta, and alpha bands. In the hippocampus, exposure to HCHF increased baseline theta and alpha power and potentiated MI (delta-gamma, theta-gamma) in TgAD rats. in response to forepaw stimulation in nTg rats. In response to forepaw stimulation, chow-fed TgAD rats showed exaggerated MI changes compared to chow-fed nTg rats, while HCHF feeding attenuated stimulation-induced MI changes in both cohorts. While the HCHF diet attenuated spiking responses to forepaw stimulation in AD-affected hippocampus, it had no effect in the cortex, where TgAD rats exhibited an overall lower response in their spiking activity. CONCLUSION: The HCHF diet partially rescues AD-related deficits in neuronal activity by restoring baseline power and synchronization, suggesting that the HCHF diet may serve as a metabolic intervention by transiently normalizing neuronal activity in the metabolically-challenged AD brain while being detrimental in normal aging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity→French-language works237,207→