Perceived social support and cognitive performance in preclinical autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perceived social support is an individual's sense of available emotional support from family and social networks. In neurodegenerative diseases, it has been explored as a potential protective factor against cognitive decline. Identifying modifiable factors is especially crucial for high-risk populations. Individuals with autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) typically develop early-onset dementia, with research suggesting that certain factors may influence the timing of clinical onset. This study investigated the effects of perceived social support on cognitive performance in members of the Colombian kindred with the PSEN1 E280A mutation. METHOD: This study included 144 cognitively-unimpaired individuals from the PSEN1 E280A cohort (64 carriers, 80 non-carriers) from the Rita/NGF biomarker study. The mean age was 30.33(SD5.74) years for carriers and 34.38(SD9.23) for non-carriers. Cognitive function was assessed using the MMSE and CERAD Word List Delayed Recall, while depression was measured with the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Perceived social support was evaluated using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), which captures support from three sources: family, friends, and significant others. Group comparisons and associations were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test and Spearman correlations. RESULTS: Carriers had lower MMSE scores than non-carriers (carriers: 26.3, SD 1.4; non-carriers: 28.8, SD 1.3; p = 0.033) and reported more depressive symptoms (carriers: 2.8, SD 3.4; non-carriers: 1.6, SD 2.2; p = 0.039). Additionally, carriers perceived lower overall social support (5.1 SD 1.3) compared to non-carriers (5.6 SD 1.2; p = 0.014), with the difference largely driven by reduced support from family and significant others. These differences remained statistically significant even after controlling for depressive symptoms. However, perceived social support was not linked to cognition, age, or education. CONCLUSION: This study found significant differences in overall perceived social support between carriers and non-carriers in individuals with autosomal dominant AD. Longitudinal follow-up of this population is essential to further explore the relationship between perceived social support and other cognitive functions, such as executive function. Evaluating perceived support may help identify modifiable risk factors for dementia and inform interventions aimed at enhancing mental and brain health in individuals at high risk for AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".