MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117263880 · doi:10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100611

Climate change emotions, perceived mental health impacts, and supports among adolescents in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A cross-sectional mixed methods exploratory study

2025· article· en· W7117263880 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew Treble, Gina Martin, Violeta Faulkner, Tooba Nadeem Akhtar, Alina Cosma, Tasha Roswell, Habib Mohammad Ali

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Climate Change and Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityAthabasca University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMental healthSadnessThematic analysisAngerClimate changeExploratory researchPsychological interventionFeelingQualitative research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Bangladesh faces frequent climate change-related extreme weather events. This study explores Bangladeshi adolescents' emotional responses to climate change and their perceived impact of climate change on their mental health. The supports they currently use and wish to have for coping with climate change related difficult thoughts and feelings are also explored. Materials & Methods: = 200; aged 1-18 years old, mean age 17.2 years, SD=1.17) from two English-speaking schools in Dhaka, Bangladesh completed an anonymous survey. Open and close-ended survey measures assessed multiple climate change emotions, climate change worry, perceived mental health impacts of climate change, and current and desired supports. Descriptive analyses were performed, and qualitative responses were examined through thematic analysis. Following a mixed methods convergent parallel design approach, qualitative and quantitative data were integrated together at interpretation. Results: Participants reported that they experienced a wide range of climate emotions, including concern (85 %), sadness (74 %), anger (63 %), guilt (63 %), and fear (63 %). Additionally, 62 % of participants indicated that they perceive their mental health has been impacted by climate change, either a lot or a little. Open-ended responses revealed that adolescents perceive climate change as impacting their mental health in multiple ways, including through negative emotions, physical symptoms, and reduced motivation. The most commonly used supports were self-education (52 %), school-based programs/clubs (51 %), and conversations with others (45 %). Participants expressed wishing they had more access to community-based programs/clubs (58 %) as well as climate action activities they could do independently (52 %). Conclusion: This exploratory study highlights that Bangladeshi adolescents may be experiencing a range of negative emotions and mental health impacts as a result of climate change. These findings are consistent with studies from other regions. While the sample was limited to students in English-speaking schools, the results can inform climate change risk mitigation and adaptation strategies. Future research should prioritize expanding to other settings in Bangladesh.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.410
GPT teacher head0.532
Teacher spread0.122 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Climate Change and HealthSame topicClimate Change Communication and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207