MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117264168 · doi:10.14740/jmc5184

Delayed Presentation of Metachronous Ascending Colonic Adenocarcinoma in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Curative Resection

2025· article· en· W7117264168 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Budhi Ida Bagus, Febriagi Bayu Aji, Nafa Unnisa, Arga Scorpianus

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColorectal cancerFOLFOXAdenocarcinomaAscending colonColorectal adenocarcinomaAdjuvant therapyCancerMetastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in both age groups in the world and one of the increasing causes of mortality each year. Particularly in early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), this age group tends to metastasize to distant organs like the liver, lung, bone, and brain and in metachronous cases. Metachronous cancer in the colorectal adenocarcinoma is usually found in the first 2 - 3 years following curative treatment, with delayed recurrences being extremely rare. We report a rare case of a 42-year-old male with a history of ascending colon adenocarcinoma diagnosed at the age of 31. He underwent curative R0 resection with lymph node involvement, followed by 6 months of adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy. He remained disease-free for 11 years under routine surveillance. In 2025, he presented with symptoms of bloody diarrhea and altered bowel habits. Imaging and colonoscopic biopsy revealed a new adenocarcinoma in the distal rectum, representing a delayed metachronous. Clinical staging confirmed localized rectal cancer with limited metastasis (T3N2bM1a). Despite surgical resection being indicated, the patient declined surgery and opted for systemic chemotherapy. He tolerated treatment well, maintained functional status, and reported a good quality of life. Delayed metachronous recurrence can occur in EOCRC even after standard adjuvant therapy and prolonged remission. EOCRC also has a chance to be a delayed metachronous case. Closed follow-up should be performed, particularly in the case of those who refused the operative treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical CasesSame topicMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersFrench-language works237,207