MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117292550 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_103436

Association between Periodontal Disease and Alzheimer's Disease Risk Factors: A Longitudinal Oral Microbiome Study

2025· article· en· W7117292550 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Irene Yang, Kevin T. Hendler, Frank A. Scannapieco, Gabrielle Boykins, Whitney Wharton

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeriodontal diseaseOral MicrobiomeMicrobiomeDiseaseAssociation (psychology)Longitudinal studyOral healthPeriodontitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggest an association between periodontal disease (PerioD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), with PerioD-associated microbial ecosystems driving oral and systemic inflammation that may activate or accelerate neuroinflammation, a hallmark of AD. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are critical factors influencing both oral health and AD risk yet are often overlooked, and rarely investigated together. This study aims to characterize and compare the oral microbiome of age- and education-matched individuals at high risk for AD by virtue of family history, with and without PerioD, and to investigate the relationships between PerioD-associated microbiome features, SDoH, systemic inflammation and brain inflammation, and AD biomarkers (in cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]). METHOD: This two-year NINDS-funded study collects oral microbiome samples, blood, and CSF annually in a cognitively normal, racially diverse cohort (n = 165). Metagenomic sequencing will be used to investigate cross-kingdom microbial communities and their association with inflammatory and systemic markers. Surveys and interviews investigate behaviors and SDoH influencing PerioD and AD risk. RESULT: To date, 55 participants have been recruited. Participants are 62 years of age on average, predominantly white (70%), female (63.3%), with Stage 1-2 periodontitis (85.7%). Preliminary analyses found no significant relationships between bleeding on probing, behavioral factors, SDoH variables, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores, which was expected given the small sample size. As recruitment continues, we anticipate identifying associations between oral microbiome features, inflammatory markers, AD biomarkers and cognitive outcomes. SDoH, such as access to dental care and oral hygiene behaviors, may mediate these relationships, offering insights into the interplay between periodontal disease, systemic inflammation, and AD risk. CONCLUSION: By leveraging longitudinal data and exploring upstream sociocultural factors, this research addresses critical gaps in understanding PerioD's contribution to AD risk. Findings will provide novel insights into the interplay between the oral microbiome, systemic inflammation, brain inflammation, and AD risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicOral microbiology and periodontitis research→French-language works237,207→