MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117294751 · doi:10.1080/09535314.2025.2607545

Invisible chains of conflict: economy-wide spillovers from an agricultural shock in Ukraine – mixed input–output evidence

2025· article· en· W7117294751 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Systems Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Canadian institutionsCenter for Interuniversity Research and Analysis on Organizations
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgricultureShock (circulatory)Agricultural productivityProductivity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article quantifies how a conflict-related agricultural supply shock propagates through Ukraine’s economy. Instead of the conventional demand-driven Leontief model, we use a mixed input – output model that introduces the shock directly as a capacity constraint in agriculture. In our central scenario, a 25% reduction in the agricultural workforce leads to a 4.6% decline in GDP, and impacts spread rapidly beyond farming. Sectors highly dependent on agricultural inputs are hit hardest, with chemicals (−30%) and motor vehicles (−28.8%) showing the largest losses, while public services remain comparatively stable. Sensitivity and robustness checks indicate near proportional effects, consistent with fixed-coefficient technologies and short-run rigidities. The results reveal a hierarchy of vulnerabilities and provide policy-relevant benchmarks to help secure critical supply chains and strengthen economic resilience against cascading shocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it