MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117295192 · doi:10.11594/untad.jan.6.1.20183

ANALISIS EFISIENSI BIAYA PRODUKSI MIE PADA UD MIE UJANG KABUPATEN JEMBER

2025· article· W7117295192 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nadia Isnaini, S Kantun, Dwi Herlindawati

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Akun Nabelo Jurnal Akuntansi Netral Akuntabel Objektif · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Research and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaw materialProduction (economics)Production costQuarter (Canadian coin)Cost analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to measure the level of efficiency of raw noodle production costs at UD Mie Ujang, Jember Regency with standard costs as a reference in the use of production costs. This research belongs to the type of quantitative descriptive research. The type of data used is the main data in the form of production cost report documents of UD Mie Ujang, Jember Regency for the first quarter of 2022 and supporting data in the form of interview results related to the condition of production cost reports. The research informants are the owners and employees of UD Mie Ujang, Jember Regency. The results showed that the use of raw noodle production costs at UD Mie Ujang, Jember Regency in the first quarter of 2022 showed efficient results. The use of production costs is more efficient in producing super raw noodles compared to ordinary raw noodles. The results of cost efficiency can be used as a consideration and decision in determining the selling price of the next product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Akun Nabelo Jurnal Akuntansi Netral Akuntabel ObjektifSame topicAgricultural Research and PracticesFrench-language works237,207