MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Understanding the Treatment Disparities in Canadian College Students Experiencing Mental Health Problems: A Regression Analysis

2025· article· en· W7117297942 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Julia Pei, Joseph H. Puyat, R. Michael Krausz, Chris G. Richardson, Richard J. Munthali, Kristen L. Hudec, Angel Wang, Lonna Munro, Yağmur Amanvermez, Pim Cuijpers, Ronny Bruffaerts, Daniel Vigo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Adolescent Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth Canada
KeywordsMental healthMental health serviceRegression analysisHealth equityHealth servicesMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Investigate the sociodemographic disparities in mental health treatment among Canadian college students through quantifying disparities at 2 critical stages of the treatment-seeking pathway: (1) perceived need for treatment and (2) service use, conditional on perceived need. METHODS: Survey data collected at 4 Canadian universities under the World Mental Health International College Student initiative were analyzed. Students meeting the criteria for 12-month mental disorder, substance use disorder, suicidal thoughts and behaviors, and/or non-suicidal self-injury were included in the analyses (N = 8,581). Multivariable logistic regression models were run to evaluate the associations between sociodemographic characteristics and (1) perceived need for mental health treatment and (2) service use, conditional on perceived need. Gender, sexual orientation, race and ethnicity, age, international student status, parental education, and financial stress were investigated as covariates. RESULTS: Students meeting the criteria for a 12-month mental health condition comprised 30.4% of the total sample. Of these students, 78.7% reported a perceived need for mental health treatment and 40.2% reported service use. Gender and sexual orientation disparities appeared to predominately arise from differences in perceived need. Conversely, disparities based on age, international student status, and financial stress appeared to predominately arise from differences in structural barriers. Disparities based on race/ethnicity and parental education appeared to arise from both attitudinal and structural barriers. DISCUSSION: Findings identify key blockage points for further investigation and highlight heterogeneity in the causes underlying sociodemographic disparities in service use, emphasizing the importance of targeted efforts to promote equitable access to mental health treatment for students.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Adolescent HealthSame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207