MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117298013 · doi:10.3390/axioms15010008

Averaged Iterative Algorithms for Convex Optimization Problems over a Common Fixed-Points Set of Demicontractive Mappings

2025· article· en· W7117298013 on OpenAlexaff
Vasile Berinde, Khairul Saleh

Bibliographic record

VenueAxioms · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHilbert spaceBounded functionConvergence (economics)Convex optimizationMinificationQuadratic equationIterative methodSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we introduce a novel averaged-type iterative scheme designed for solving convex minimization problems over the set of common fixed points of a pair of demicontractive mappings. Under suitable assumptions, we prove that the proposed algorithm converges strongly to the solution of the considered problem in a Hilbert space setting. We further demonstrate the applicability of our method to quadratic optimization problems with a bounded linear operator. In addition, we also report the numerical experiments that were performed in order to demonstrate the convergence behavior of the algorithm and to highlight its superiority over related existing methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.480

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAxiomsSame topicOptimization and Variational AnalysisFrench-language works237,207