MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117298283 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18051033

The Geometry of Differentiation Boundaries under a Global Zero Constraint: Spectral Invariants and the Emergence of Spacetime and Matter

2025· preprint· en· W7117298283 on OpenAlexaff
Hangjoon Choi

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsNexen (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpacetimeBoundary (topology)GraphFocus (optics)Spectral geometryLaplace operatorAction (physics)Dimension (graph theory)Planck

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study proposes that the universe is not a collection of independent entities, but a product of relational differentiation arising under a Global Zero Constraint ($\sum U_i = 0$). Instead of addressing the intractable dynamics of the differentiation process, we focus on the geometric structure of the Stabilized Boundary where differentiation has saturated. By modeling this boundary as a weighted graph and applying Spectral Geometry, we demonstrate that: The macroscopic spacetime dimension converges to $d_s \approx 4$ at the critical point of heat diffusion and recurrence. Matter and gravity are naturally derived from the eigenmodes of the Laplacian and the Spectral Action principle. Fundamental constants such as the Planck length, the cosmological constant, and the speed of light are reinterpreted as geometric cut-offs of the graph structure. The central contribution of this work is to show that spacetime, matter, and gravity are not separate entities but can be consistently re-located as spectral invariants of a differentiation boundary stabilized under a global constraint. This paper addresses only the Observer-free sector, providing a new interpretive framework for how existing physical theories can be reconstructed upon a background-independent discrete structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→