MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117301116 · doi:10.1002/alz70858_102598

VR‐based Physical Activity Improves Cognition in Frail Nursing Home Residents with Diagnosed or Suspected Dementia in Hong Kong

2025· article· en· W7117301116 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mandi Tang, Ge Lin Kan

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaNursing homesCognitionPhysical activityIntervention (counseling)Cognitive impairmentActivities of daily living

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Physical activity is a promising clinical intervention for slowing the progression of Alzheimer's disease. But it understudied in people with frailty. METHOD: A rehabilitation bike with immersive familiar VR streets in Hong Kong was provided for this physical activity intervention program. A total of 21 frail nursing home residents (age: mean = 81.17, sd = 9.06) with diagnosed or suspected dementia participated in a 12-week physical activity (PA) intervention program to verify if PA can improve cognition. All participants continued their standard care if any. Cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment/MoCA) and physical function (Activities of Daily Living/ADL-BI) were assessed before and after the intervention program. RESULT: MoCA scores improved significantly following the 12-week physical activity intervention, increasing from a mean of 14.39 (SD 5.59) to 17.61 (SD 7.41), with a mean difference of 3.22 (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: VR-based physical activity is an effective intervention for improving cognition in frail nursing home residents with diagnosed or suspected dementia. This results demonstrated the potential to slow the progression of AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.089

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→